Attorney General for Canada v Cain and another
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1906 |
| Year | 1906 |
| Date | 1906 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
80 cases
-
Ruddock v Vadarlis and Others
...its borders, and to legislate for this purpose: Robtelmes v. BrennanUNK (1906) 4 CLR 395 (Robtelmes); Attorney-General (Can) v. CainELR [1906] AC 542; [1904–07] All ER Rep 582 (Cain's case). It is said that, in this case, the people rescued by the MV Tampa may be lawfully prevented from ent......
-
Ramon Lop v The Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas the Minister of Immigration Director of Immigration
...Takitota v. The Attorney General et al [2009] UKPC 11; applied The Attorney-General for the Dominion of Canada v. Everett Cain and anor [1906] AC 542; mentioned Thompson v. Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis HSU v. Same [1998] QB 498; considered Volpi & anor v. Volpi [2022] EWCA Ci......
-
Kindler v. Canada (Minister of Justice), (1991) 129 N.R. 81 (SCC)
...Lyons, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 309; 80 N.R. 161; 82 N.S.R.(2d) 271; 207 A.P.R. 271, refd to. [paras. 7, 52]. Attorney General of Canada v. Cain, [1906] A.C. 542, refd to. [para. 11]. Kindler v. Minister of Employment and Immigration, [1987] 3 F.C. 34; 80 N.R. 388 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 11]. Shep......
-
Laurentiu v Minister for Justice
...680 F SUPP 793 SUNSHINE COAL CO V ADKINS 1940 310 US 381 CHU KHENG LIM V MIN FOR IMMIGRATION 1992 176 CLR 1 CANADA, AG V CAIN & GILHULA 1906 AC 542 VATTEL LAW OF NATIONS BOOK 1 S231; BOOK 2 S125 QUINN, STATE V RYAN 1965 IR 70 KOHN CONSTITUTION OF IRISH FREE STATE (1932) 181 CONSTITUTION A......
Request a trial to view additional results
15 books & journal articles
-
THE CHIARELLI DOCTRINE: IMMIGRATION EXCEPTIONALISM AND THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS.
...under section 1. See ibid at paras 30-34. (58) Chiarelli, supra note 9. (59) See e.g. Attorney General for the Dominion of Canada v Cain, [1906] AC 542 at 546 One of the rights possessed by the supreme power in every State is the right to refuse to permit an alien to enter that State, to an......
-
DOES LIM TRULY HAVE 'NOTHING TO SAY' ABOUT THE COMMONWEALTH'S REGIONAL PROCESSING ARRANGEMENTS? HABEAS CORPUS AS A VEHICLE FOR TESTING THE CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF OFFSHORE DETENTION.
...10 OLR 469, 478 (Anglin J) (Ontario High Court of Justice). (350) Robtelmes (n 348) 411 (emphasis added), quoting A-G (Canada) v Cain [1906] AC 542, 545 (Lord Atkinson for the Judicial Committee). See also Znaty v Minister for Immigration (1972) 126 CLR 1, 12 (Walsh J, McTiernan J agreeing ......
-
The Exclusion of (Failed) Asylum Seekers from Housing and Home: Towards an Oppositional Discourse
...its social or material interests.' (E. deVattel, Law of Nations, book 1, s. 231; book 2, s. 125); A-G for the Dominion ofCanada v. Cain [1906] A.C. 542, at 546, per Lord Atkinson.10 While state nationals have the right to enter the territory of the state, non-nationalshave only limited righ......
-
COVID Travel Bans, Citizenship and the Constitution: Do Australian Citizens Have a Constitutional Right of Abode?
...Re Yates(1925) 37 CLR 36, 110 (Isaacs J); Robtelmes vBrenan (1906) 4 CLR 395, 400 (Griffith CJ), quoting Attorney General (Can) v Cain [1906] AC 542, 546 (Atkinson LJ);Singh (n 11) 378 [134] (McHugh J).562 Federal Law Review justify an implied power to legislate for the removal of persons ......
Request a trial to view additional results