Attorney General for New Zealand v Brown
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1917 |
| Date | 1917 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Reid's Trustees v Cattanach's Trustees
...v. PemselELR, [1891] A. C. 531, Lord Watson at pp. 559 and 561, Lord Macnaghten at p. 583; Attorney-General for New Zealand v. BrownELR, [1917] A. C. 393, Lord Buckmaster at p. 395; Harper's Trustees v. Jacobs, supra, p. 345; Robbie's Judicial Factor v. MacraeUNK, (1893) 20 R. 358, Lord M'L......
-
Chichester Diocesan Fund & Board of Finance (Incorporated) v Simpson
...is a bequest in favour of benevolent purposes to be selected by the testator's trustees sufficiently specific. (See, e.g. Attorney-General for New Zealand v. Brown [1917], A.C. 393, and Attorney-General of New Zealand v. New Zealand Insurance Co., Ltd., 1936, 3 All Eng. Rep. 8One class of ......
-
Attorney General v Royal Trust Company Ltd et Al
...law in holding that he was bound in this matter by the decision in the case of the Attorney General of New Zealand v. Brown and others, [1917] AC 393 and holding that that case was a precedent for concluding that the word ‘and’ may be changed to ‘or’ in this case (6) the learned Chief Justi......
-
Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd, NO v Betts Brown and Others
...1949 (2) A.E.R. 537 at pp. 539H - 540A, 543C. The purpose may be benevolent but it is not charitable. A.G. for New Zealand v Brown, 1917 A.C. 393; A.G. for New Zealand v N.Z. Insurance Co. Ltd., 1936 (3) A.E.R. 888; Chichester Diocesan Fund case, supra. Benevolent purposes may go beyond cha......
Request a trial to view additional results