Attorney General for Saskatchewan v Attorney General for Canada
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judgment Date | 1948 |
Year | 1948 |
Date | 1948 |
Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 cases
-
Calgary (City) v Bell Canada Inc., 2020 ABCA 211
...a business standpoint the export of the ore or concentrates produced from the only iron mines in the province”); Saskatchewan v. Canada, [1949] A.C. 110, 124 (P.C. 1948) (Can.) (reducing the amount of the principal due by the amount of interest due did not alter the fact that this was a law......
-
Saputo Inc. et al. v. Canada (Attorney General), (2011) 414 N.R. 45 (FCA)
...Re, [1976] 2 S.C.R. 373; 9 N.R. 541, refd to. [para. 22]. Reference Re Validity of Section 6 of the Farm Security Act, 1944 (Sask.), [1949] A.C. 110 (P.C.), refd to. [para. Saskatchewan (Attorney General) v. Canada (Attorney General) - see Reference Re Validity of Section 6 of the Farm Secu......
-
R. v. Morgentaler, (1993) 157 N.R. 97 (SCC)
...2 W.W.R. 577; 39 C.C.C.(3d) 385; 48 D.L.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. 28]. Saskatchewan (Attorney General) v. Canada (Attorney General), [1949] A.C. 110 (P.C.), refd to. [para. Hodge v. R. (1883), 9 App. Cas. 117 (P.C.), refd to. [para. 31]. Bell Canada v. Commission de la santé et de la sécur......
-
Saputo Inc. c. Canada (Procureur général),
...Reference as to the Validity of Section 6 of the Farm Security Act 1944 of Saskatchewan, [1949] 2 D.L.R. 145, [1949] 1 W.W.R. 742, [1949] A.C. 110 (P.C.); R. v. Morgentaler, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 463, (1993), 125 N.S.R. (2d) 81, 107 D.L.R. (4th) 537; Attorney General of Alberta v. Attorney Genera......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
-
EXCLUSIVELY YOURS: RECONSIDERING INTERJURISDICTIONAL IMMUNITY.
...Fort Sheppard Railway Co, [1899] AC 626 at 627-28 (PC), 12 CRAC 224; Saskatchewan (AG) v Canada (AG) (1948), [1949] 2 DLR 145 at 151, [1949] AC 110 (53) See originally Tennant v Union Bank of Canada (1893), [1894] AC 31, [1893] UKPC 53 (BAILII). (54) Consider, for example, the contrasting v......
-
Business and Property Income
...The right must be legally enforceable. For 63 Reference re s 6 of Farm Security Act 1944 (Saskatchewan) , [1947] SCR 394 at 411, aff’d [1949] AC 110 (PC); Canada v Melford Developments Inc , [1982] 2 SCR 504; see also Halsbury’s Laws of England , 4th ed, vol 32 (London: Butterworths, 1980) ......
-
Liabilities
...or immovable property or depreciable property); and 11 Ref re s 6 of Farm Security Act, 1944 of Sask , [1947] SCR 394 at 411 (SCC); afd [1949] AC 110, ( sub nom AG Sask v AG Can) (PC); Riches v Westminster Bank Ltd , [1947] AC 390 (UKHL). 12 Emerson v The Queen , [1986] 1 CTC 422, 86 DTC 61......
-
Basic Principles
...58 Reference re s 6 of Farm Security Act, 1944 (Saskatchewan) , [1947] SCR 394 at 411, aff’d ( sub nom AG Saskatchewan v AG Canada ) [1949] AC 110 (PC); Riches v Westminster Bank Ltd , [1947] AC 390 (HL); see also Chapter 8. 59 Emerson v Canada , [1986] 1 CTC 422 (FCA), leave to appeal to S......
Request a trial to view additional results