Attorney General of The Bahamas v Royal Trust Company

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1986
Date1986
Year1986
CourtPrivy Council

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Ip (Or Yip) Cheung (Or Chiang) Kwok v Ip Siu Bun
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 15 June 1990
    ...or public well being. I respectfully adopt what was said by Loru Oliver in Attorney General of the Bahamas v. Royal Trust Co. [1986]1 W.L.R. 1001 (P.C.) regarding the meaning of "welfare" when used in connection with a class of children and young people. At p.1005 he "But 'welfare' is a wor......
  • Bridge Trust Company Ltd v Att Gen
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 30 April 1996
    ...A.C. 262; [1923] All E.R. Rep. 123, distinguished. (2) -Att.-Gen. (Bahamas) v. Royal Trust Co.UNK(1983), 36 W.I.R. 1; on appeal, [1986] 1 W.L.R. 1001; [1986] 3 All E.R. 423, followed. (3) -Att.-Gen. (New Zealand) v. Brown, [1917] A.C. 393; [1916–17] All E.R. Rep. 245. (4) -Blair v. Duncan, ......
  • Wahr-Hansen v Bridge Trust Company Ltd
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • 28 November 1997
    ...[1923] All E.R. Rep. 123, dicta of Lord Cave applied. (5) Att.-Gen. (Bahamas) v. Royal Trust Co.UNK(1983), 36 W.I.R. 1; on appeal, [1986] 1 W.L.R. 1001; [1986] 3 All E.R. 423, dicta of Luckhoo, P. applied. (6) Att.-Gen. (New Zealand) v. Brown, [1917] A.C. 393; [1916-17] All E.R. Rep. 245. (......
  • To Kan Chi And Others v Pui Man Yau And Others
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 3 February 2000
    ...exclusively charitable (see Dunae v. Byrne [1912] A.C. 407; A.G. of New Zealand v. Brown [1917] AC 393; A.G. of Bahamas v. Royal Trust [1986] 1 WLR 1001). Moreover, it is not argued, nor are we persuaded, that the institution of charitable trust exists in Chinese customary law or that there......