Attorney General's Reference (No. 3 of 2003)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 07 April 2004 |
| Date | 07 April 2004 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
R v Ebanks, ex p Henderson
...the offence of misconduct in public office contrary to common law were summarized by Pill, L.J. in Att. Gen.”s Ref. (No. 3 of 2003) (4) ([2005] Q.B. 73, at para. 61) as follows: ‘(1) [A] public officer acting as such . . . (2) wilfully neglects to perform his duty and/or wilfully misconduct......
-
R (oao “Monica”) v Director of Public Prosecutions
...a perverse conclusion. The law was correctly stated in the decision, in particular the decisions of the Court of Appeal in Attorney-General's Reference (No. 3 of 2003) [2005] QB 73 and R v Chapman [2015] 2 Cr App R 10. The key issues here were whether Mr Boyling wilfully neglected to perfor......
-
Watkins v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others
...for the common law offence of misconduct in public office: see Attorney General's Reference (No 3 of 2003) [2004] EWCA Crim 868, [2005] QB 73. Breach of a fundamental human or constitutional right would also, in all probability, found a claim under section 7 of the Human Rights Act 1998, ......
-
Antonia Ilia v Appeal Court in Athens (Greece) and Another
...if committed in England constitute the offence of misconduct in public office. He referred to the judgment of Pill LJ in Attorney General's Reference (no. 3 of 2003) [2005] QB 73, which sets out the elements of that offence as follows (para. 61): "The circumstances in which the offence may ......
Request a trial to view additional results