Attorney General's Reference (No. 3 of 2003)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Judgment Date07 April 2004
Date07 April 2004

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
19 cases
  • R v Ebanks, ex p Henderson
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 29 October 2008
    ...referred to. (3) Att.-Gen. (Jamaica) v. Williams, [1998] A.C. 351; [1997] 3 W.L.R. 389, applied. (4) Att. Gen.”s Ref. (No. 3 of 2003), [2005] Q.B. 73; [2004] 3 W.L.R. 451; [2005] 4 All E.R. 303; [2004] 2 Cr. App. R. 23; [2004] EWCA Crim 868, applied. (5) Badry v. D.P.P., [1983] 2 A.C. 297; ......
  • Antonia Ilia v Appeal Court in Athens (Greece) and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 14 July 2014
    ...if committed in England constitute the offence of misconduct in public office. He referred to the judgment of Pill LJ in Attorney General's Reference (no. 3 of 2003) [2005] QB 73, which sets out the elements of that offence as follows (para. 61): "The circumstances in which the offence may ......
  • R (oao “Monica”) v Director of Public Prosecutions
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 14 December 2018
    ...was correctly stated in the decision, in particular the decisions of the Court of Appeal in Attorney-General's Reference (No. 3 of 2003) [2005] QB 73 and R v Chapman [2015] 2 Cr App R 10. The key issues here were whether Mr Boyling wilfully neglected to perform his duty or wilfully miscondu......
  • Watkins v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 29 March 2006
    ... ... 3 During the relevant period (1 May ... v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No 3) [2003] 2 AC 1 to be an essential ingredient ... lawyers lost sight of this tort, and reference (for example) to the 14th edition of Clerk & ... The plaintiff in Garrett v Attorney-General [1997] 2 NZLR 332 claimed damages for ... ...
  • Get Started for Free