Attorney General v Antrobus

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1905
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
32 cases
  • Re Ellenborough Park; Re Davies, deceased; Powell v Maddison
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 15 November 1955
    ...1903 in the case of ( International Tea Stores v. Hobbs 1903, 2 Chancery, page 165) and in 1905 in ( Attorney-General v. Antrobus 1905, 2 Chancery, page. 188) used language appearing to treat as axiomatic the proposition, that a right which should properly be described as a jus spatiandi ......
  • Catherine Renée Connell v Coleman Porter
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 18 December 1972
    ...cannot be heard to say that roadway on which he has allowed public money to be spent is a private road: per Farwell J., A.G. v. Antrobus (1905) 2 Ch. 188, at p.207. Coupled with evidence of user such expenditure is strong evidence from which dedication can be inferred. See also Vernon v. Ve......
  • The King (at the prosecution of Joseph O'Neill) v The County Court Judge and Chairman of The Quarter Sessions, and Other The Justices of The Peace in and for The Country of Tyrone
    • Ireland
    • King's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 14 December 1916
    ... ... Fermoy Commissioners (3), per Holmes L.J., at p. 313; Brinckman v. Matley (4); Attorney-General v. Antrobus (5); White v. Feast (6); R. (White) v. Wicklow JJ. (7); R. (Kealy) v. Louth JJ ... ...
  • Walker v Leonach
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 8 February 2012
    ...[1991] Ch 271; Bruen v Murphy (Unrep, McWilliam J, 11/3/1980); Simpson v Attorney General [1904] AC 476; Attorney General v Antrobus [1905] 2 Ch 188; Williams-Ellis v Cobb [1935] 1 KB 310; Boswell v Rathmines and Pembroke Joint Hospital Board [1904] 1 IR 165; Szabo v Esat Digifone [1998] 2......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Criteria for Registration in Commons Act 2006, Section 15
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part II. Town and village greens
    • 30 August 2016
    ...from a single locality. Lord Hoffmann further opined in Oxfordshire that a neighbourhood within a 78 [2012] EWCA Civ 262 at [29]. 79 [1905] 2 Ch 188. 80 [1896] 1 Ch 308. 81 [1975] Ch 380. 82 [1975] Ch 380 at 387A. 83 [2000] 1 AC 335. 84 [2006] UKHL 25, [2006] 2 AC 674. 85 [2006] UKHL 25, [2......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Public Rights of Way: The Essential Law Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...(CS), QBD 35, 39 Ashby v Secretary of State for the Environment [1980] 1 WLR 673, [1980] 1 All ER 508, 78 LGR 226, CA 76 A-G v Antrobus [1905] 2 Ch 188, 3 LGR 1071, 69 JP 141, ChD 5 Attorney General v Beynon [1970] 1 Ch 1, [1969] 2 WLR 1447, [1969] 2 All ER 263, ChD 85 Attorney-General v Es......
  • Rights of the Public
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Public Rights of Way: The Essential Law Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...Wimbledon & Putney Commons Conservators v Dixon (1875) 1 Ch D 362 (way across open land divided into parallel routes). 3 A-G v Antrobus [1905] 2 Ch 188. 4 Rugby Charity Trustees v Merryweather (1790) 11 East 375n. 5 R v St Issey Inhabitants (1849) 14 LT(OS) 176. 6 Williams-Ellis v Cobb [193......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT