Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 3)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 20 February 1992 |
| Date | 20 February 1992 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
CC v AB
... ... If that is so for journalists, or for scandal mongers in general, it is a matter for consideration whether, and to what extent, a ... that they call for the most careful scrutiny": Observer Ltd and Guardian Newspapers Ltd v United Kingdom (1991) 14 EHRR 153 at [60]. So too in ... ...
-
Attorney General v Random House Group Ltd
...publication (see A-G v English [1982] 2 All ER 903 at 918, [1983] 1 AC 116 at 141 per Lord Diplock and A-G v Guardian Newspapers Ltd… [1992] 3 All ER 38 at 48–49, [1992] 1 WLR 874 at 885); nevertheless, the mere fact that, by reason of earlier publications, there is already some risk of ......
-
R v Sherwood ex parte The Telegraph Group Plc and Others
...readers and viewers about issues of public interest including the administration of justice: see also Att.-Gen. v. Guardian (No. 3) [1992] 1 W.L.R. 874, 886 ( per Brooke J) and McCartan Turkington Breen v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [2000] 4 All E.R. 913, 927–8 (Lord Steyn) . It would not be rig......
-
HM Attorney General v Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
...s 4(2) order: see [1982] 1 QB 798B-C (Shaw LJ), 805B-E, 806E-F (Ackner LJ). See also the obiter remarks of Brooke LJ in Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 3) [1992] 1 WLR 874, 884H–885A, which are to the same effect. We agree with the conclusion of the editors of Arlidge, Eady ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Contempt Proceedings Permitted Against The Sun And Daily Mirror
...behind the legislation is deterrence (Att.-Gen. v. English [1983] A.C. 116 at141, HL; Att.-Gen. v. Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No.3) [1992] 1 W.L.R. 874, DC). However an action brought in this circumstance raises major issues pursuant to Article 10 of the ECHR. The newspapers can surely argue ......
1 books & journal articles
-
OPEN JUSTICE, 'BACK-TO-BACK' TRIALS AND JUROR PREJUDICE: EXAMINING THE SUPPRESSION ORDER IN THE TRIAL OF GEORGE PELL.
...the orders themselves are not available: see, eg, R v Wilson [2007] VSC 498, [4]-[6] (Harper J); A-G v Guardian Newspapers Ltd [No 3] [1992] 1 WLR 874, 877 (Mann LJ). Note that there are also a number of decisions where the same accused was facing separate trials on unrelated offences where......