Attorney General v Hooper
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1893 |
| Date | 1893 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
- Sydney Corporation v Harris
-
R (Wexford County Council) v Local Government Board for Ireland
...L. R. Ir. 371. (6) 16 L. R. Ir. 150. (7) 6 B. & S. 401. (8) 14 C. B. (N. S.) at p. 189. (9) L. R. 8 Q. B. 344. (10) 2 Cr. & J. 558. (11) [1893] 3 Ch. 483. (12) [1896] 2 I. R. (13) 8 De G. M. & G. 487. (14) 5 App. Cas. 25. (15) 10 L. R. Ir. 217. (16) [1894] 2 I. R. 158. (17) 15 I. L. T. R. 1......
-
R v Ngwevela
...to the case against him and the Privy Council held that that was sufficient. A similar view was taken in Attorney-General v Hooper, 1893 (3) Ch. 483, and in the cases quoted in A the judgment in that case. Those cases differ from the present case in that in those cases the orders issued did......
-
Hooper v Superintendent, Johannesburg Gaol and Another (2)
...to the allegations, and the 1958 (2) SA p162 Cillié J Privy Council held that that was sufficient. So also in Attorney-General v Hooper, 1893 (3) Ch. 483, a local authority, if it considered a sign, projecting into the street, a nuisance, had power to give the occupier fourteen days' notice......
Request a trial to view additional results