Attorney General v Lord Hotham

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1827
Date01 January 1827
CourtHigh Court of Chancery
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • Compagnie des chemins de fer nationaux du Canada c. Emerson Milling Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 18 April 2017
    ...(1750), 27 E.R. 1144, 1 Ves. Sen. 462; Penn v. Lord Baltimore (1750), 27 E.R. 1132, 1 Ves. Sen. 444; Attorney General v. Lord Hotham (1827), 38 E.R. 631, 3 Russ. 415; Thompson v. Sheil (1840), 3 Ir. Eq. R. 135; Re: Resolution to amend the Constitution, [1981] 1 S.C.R. 753, (1981), 34 Nà......
  • Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council v VW & Ors
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Court
    • 18 October 2022
    ...Evidence Act 1995. Mental Health Act 1983, s 2. Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (SI 1998/3132), r 14.1. Cases referred to A-G v Lord Hotham (1827) 38 ER 631, (1827) 3 Russ 415, Court of Ashby v White (1702) 2 Ld Raymond 938. B (threshold criteria: agreed facts), Re[1999] 2 FCR 328, [1998] 2 FLR ......
  • Harrison v Wells
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 28 July 1966
    ... ... Lord Justice Willmer ... Lord, Justice Harman and ... Lord Justice Salmon ... Johnston at page 205, who said this: "In the well-known case of Attorney-General v. Hot ham, Sir George Turner (Master of the Rolls) said: 'With ... ...
  • Re X (Court of Protection Practice)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 June 2015
    ...Laws of England, Courts and Tribunals (Volume 24 (2010)) 2, paragraph 623 and the cases cited in footnote 2. 3A-G v Lord Hotham (1827) 3 Russ 415. 4Thompson v Shiel (1840) 3 Ir Eq R 135. 5 See e.g. section 35 (power of a receiver or manager to apply to the court for directions), section 112......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Jurisdiction
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon's Laws of Nigeria. Volume 13 Jurisdiction
    • 10 July 2016
    ...itself to exercise a jurisdiction, which it does not possess, its decision amounts to nothing. (See: Attorney-General v. Lord Hotham (1827) 3 Russ 415; also Halsbury’s Laws of England Vol. 10 4th Edition Para. 715).” - Per Idigbe J.S.C. in Peenok Ltd. v. Hotel Presidential Ltd. Suit No. S.C......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT