Attorney General v Mersey Railway Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1907 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Irish Land Commission v Forde
...6 C. B. (N. S.) 336, at p.356. (1) 39 I. L. T. R. 262. (1) 6 C. B. (N.S.), at p. 356. (1) 10 App. C., at p. 129, per Lord Selborne. (2) [1907] A.C. 415, at (1) [1916] 2 I. R. 148. (2) 11 H. L. C. 443. (3) 6 B. & C. 80, at p. 83. (4) [1907] 2 K. B. 923, at p. 981. (1) In the Court of Appeal,......
-
Midtown Ltd v City of London Real Property Company Ltd
...assigned from time to time and even where it is surrendered and a new lease is granted:- Fear v Morgan [1906] 2 Ch 406 and Morgan v Fear [1907] AC 415 at 429. All of that of course ensures that Midtown as freeholder takes the benefit of the restrictive rights being acquired by the tenant in......
-
Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council and Others
...13 to the Act of 1972 imposes restrictions on the borrowing powers of local authorities. 37In Attorney-General v. Mersey Railway Co. [1907] A.C. 415, a railway company was held not entitled to run a number of omnibuses which it claimed were incidental to the railway enterprise itself. Lord ......
-
Winnipeg (City of) v Canadian Pacific Railway Company
...1950 A.C. 122. 14 [1951] S.C.R. 190 . 15 (1900) 30 Can. S.C.R. 558 at 561. 16 (1887) L.R. 36 Ch. Div. 67Sn . 17 1916 A.C. 566 at 583. 18 1907 A.C. 415 at 417. 19 (1880) 5 A.C. 473 at 478. 20 1925 A.C. 691 at 695. 21 (1901) 1 O.L.R. 480 . 22 (1901) 1 O.L.R. 481 . 23 (1905) 35 Can. S.C.R. 48 ......
Request a trial to view additional results