Attorney General v Smith
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1958 |
| Date | 1958 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Hughes v Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council
...machinery for the enforcement of planning control initiated by the service of an enforcement notice, was unlawful ab initio: Attorney General v. Smith [1958] 2 Q.B. 173. But the Act of 1947 imposed a time limit for the service of an enforcement notice of four years from the date when the d......
-
Watkins v Kidson
...without permission, his action may be described as "unlawful": it was so described by Lord Goddard C.J. in Attorney General v. Smith [1958] 2 Q.B. 173 [1958] 2 Q.B. 173, 180–1. But the words "become unlawful" in paragraph 23 are not, as I understand them, used in this sense. They contain a ......
-
Watkins v Kidson (HM Inspector of Taxes)
...to us as illustrating the proposition that development of land carried out without permission is unlawful:Attorney-General v. Smith [1958] 2 QB 173;L.T.S.S. Print and Supply Services Ltd. v. Hackney Borough Council and The Secretary of State for the Environment [1976] 2 WLR 253. 5. It was c......
-
Chairman, Aldermen, Councillors and Electors of the Region of Diego Martin and Attorney General v Edfam
...234, 28 LGR 513, CA, 28(2) Digest (Reissue) 962, 37. 23.6. Attorney General (at the relation of Egham Urban District Council) v. Smith [1958] 2 All ER 557, [1958] 2 QB 173, [1958] 3 WLR 81, 122 JP 367, 56 LGR 295, 9 P & CR 439, 28(2) (Reissue) 963, 47. 23.7. Attorney General v. Wimbledo......
Request a trial to view additional results