Attorney General v Valle-Jones

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1935
Year1935
CourtKing's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
19 cases
  • Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Hambrook
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 30 July 1956
    ...the anomalousnature of the action per quod servitium amisit. Then in 1935 came the case of ( Attorney-General v. valle- Jones 1935, 2 King's pench, page 209), where two were injured as a result of a collision with a whereby the crown lost their services; and in 1947, ( Mankin v. scala 194......
  • Attorney-General (Nsw) v Perpetual Trustee Company (Ltd)
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Attorney General and Minister for Justice v Dublin United Tramways Company
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1940
    ...measure of the value of such services. Carolan v. Minister for DefenceIR [1927] I. R. 62, and Attorney-Generalv. Valle-JonesELR [1935] 2 K. B. 209, followed. A man employed by the defendant, Cairns, to drive a tractor, permitted the plaintiff, a boy aged ten years, to ride with him along th......
  • Coleman and MacDonald v Smith
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 24 September 1979
    ...Perpetual Trustee Co. [1955] A.C. 457: [1955] 1 All E.R. 846 (P.C) and I.R.C. v. Hambrook [1956] 1 All E.R. 578 (C.A) overruling Attorney General v. Valle Jones [1935] 2 K.B. 209; [1933] All E.R. 175. Nor can the plaintiff sue to recover them, for if they were paid to him as of right, i.e. ......
  • Get Started for Free