Austin v Keele

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1987
Date1987
Year1987
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • Lee Hudson v Jayne Hathway
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 21 March 2022
    ...to embark unless she was to have an interest in the property. Ms Saunders relied on the Privy Council's decision in Austin v. Keele (1987) 72 ALR 579, per Lord Oliver at 586–588, which included the proposition at 587 that: “There has to be some conduct detrimental to the cestui que trust, e......
  • Oxley v Hiscock
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 6 May 2004
    ...upon the common intention by the claimant and in regard to the quantification of his or her beneficial interest in the property. In Austin v Keele [1987] ALJR 605 at p 609; 72 ALR 579 at p 587, Lord Oliver of Aylmerton, in delivering the judgment of the Privy Council, said that in essence t......
  • Lloyds Bank Plc v Carrick and Carrick
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 February 1996
    ...principle applied and for that purpose relied on the statement of Lord Oliver of Aylmerton in giving the opinion of the Privy Council in Austin v Keele (1987) 61 A. L.J. R. 605 at 609 where he said “Although Lord Diplock [ Gissing v Gissing (1971) AC 886 at p.905] referred to the formation ......
  • Draper v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Interests in the family home: constructive trusts and estoppel compared
    • Caribbean Community
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 3-1, June 1993
    • 1 June 1993
    ...ownership in a few. By 46 [1986] 1 W.L.R.1498 (reliance on mutual wills and secret trusts, rather than common intention trusts). 47 (1987) 61 A.L.J.R.605 at 609. 48 [1991] 1 A.C.107 at 132-133. See also Ungurian v. Lesnoff [1990] Ch. 206. 49 [1991] 1 F.L.R.391 at 398-399. way of contrast, e......
  • ULTRA VIRES AND CORPORATE CAPACITY IN SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1989, December 1989
    • 1 December 1989
    ...this case deal with promoters, the same must be true of directors who like promoters are fiduciaries of the company. 24. Austin v Keele(1987) 72 ALR 579, 585 (Privy Council on appeal from New South Wales). 25. See eg Re David Payne & Co Ltd[1904] 2 Ch 608, 617—620 (Court of Appeal, England)......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT