Author Index
| Date | 01 October 2007 |
| DOI | 10.1350/ijep.2007.11.4.363 |
| Published date | 01 October 2007 |
| Subject Matter | Author Index |
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOF 363
AUTHOR INDEX
Allen, Ronald J. and Michael S. Pardo, ‘Proba-
bility, explanation and inference: a reply’
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .307
Bagshaw, Roderick, ‘Facts relevant to the
assessment of damages in defamation:
Turner vNews Group Newspapers Ltd’ . . . . . 134
Burton, Mandy, Roger Evans and Andrew
Sanders, ‘Vulnerable and intimidated
witnesses and the adversarial process in
England and Wales’. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Choo, Andrew L.-T. and Susan Nash,‘Improperly
obtained evidence in the Commonwealth:
lessons for England and Wales?’ . . . . . . . . 75
Colyvan, Mark and Helen M. Regan, ‘Legal
decisions and the reference class problem’
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .274
Doak, Jonathan, review of Litigation II: evidence
& criminal process, 7th edition, by Jill
Hunter, Camille Cameron and Terese
Henning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
Duff, Peter, ‘Disclosure in Scottish criminal
procedure: another step in an inquisitorial
direction?’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .153
Evans, Roger, Mandy Burton and Andrew
Sanders, ‘Vulnerable and intimidated
witnesses and the adversarial process in
England and Wales’. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Giannoulopoulos, Dimitrios, ‘The exclusion of
improperly obtained evidence in Greece:
putting constitutional rights first’ . . . . . 181
Goudkamp, James, ‘Litigation privilege:
transient or timeless? Blank vCanada
(Minister of Justice)’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322
Ho, H. L., review of Truth, error, and criminal law
an essay in legal epistemology by Larry Laudan
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .354
Hodgson, Jacqueline, review of The trial on trial
(volume 1): truth and due process edited by
Antony Duff, Lindsay Farmer, Sandra
Marshall and Victor Tadros . . . . . . . . . . . . .69
Ives, Dale E., ‘R v Khelawon continuing reform of
the law of hearsay in Canada’ . . . . . . . . . . 213
Ives, Dale E. and Stephen G. A. Pitel, ‘Filling in
the blanks for litigation privilege: Blank v
Canada (Minister of Justice)’. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Laudan, Larry, ‘Strange bedfellows: inference
to the best explanation and the criminal
standard of proof’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
Lewis, Paul, ‘Litigants in person and their diffi-
culties in adducing evidence:
a study of small claims in an English
county court’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Nance, Dale A., ‘The reference class problem
and mathematical models of inference’ 259
Nash, Susan and Andrew L.-T. Choo,
‘Improperly obtained evidence in the
Commonwealth: lessons for England and
Wales?’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .75
Pardo, Michael S., ‘Reference classes and legal
evidence’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255
Pardo, Michael S. and Ronald J. Allen, ‘Proba-
bility, explanation and inference: a reply’
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .307
Pitel, Stephen G. A. and Dale E. Ives, ‘Filling in
the blanks for litigation privilege: Blank v
Canada (Minister of Justice)’. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Regan, Helen M. and Mark Colyvan, ‘Legal
decisions and the reference class problem’
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .274
Rhee, Robert J., ‘Probability, policy and the
problem of reference class’ . . . . . . . . . . . .286
Roberts, Andrew, review of Effective interviewing
and interrogation techniques, 2nd edn,
by Nathan Gordon and William Fleischer
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .352
Roberts, Paul, ‘From theory into practice:
introducing the reference class problem’
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .243
Sanders, Andrew, Mandy Burton and Roger
Evans, ‘Vulnerable and intimidated
witnesses and the adversarial process in
England and Wales’. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Spencer, Keith, ‘The common enterprise
exception to the hearsay rule’ . . . . . . . . . 106
Tapper, Colin, ‘Use of third party confessions:
RvFinch’. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318
Wheatcroft, Jacqueline, review of Court licensed
abuse: patriarchal lore and the legal response to
intra-familial sexual abuse of children by
S. Caroline Taylor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
To continue reading
Request your trial