B (A Child) v Todd and South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2002 |
| Year | 2002 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
...compare the comments of Munby J in Ryan v Liverpool Health Authority [2002] Lloyd's Rep Med 23, and of myself in Bell v Todd [2002] Lloyd's Rep Med 12. The relevant provisions are summarised and so far as necessary set out in Annex 1 to this judgment. For present purposes, the effect of t......
-
Sowden v Lodge ; Crookdale v Drury
...the past and will not have to pay in the future, see Firth v George Ackroyd Junior Ltd [2001] Lloyd's Rep Med 312, and Bell v Todd [2002] Lloyd's Rep Med 12. 89 I did occasionally wonder during the hearing whether it was really the intention of the draftsman of the 1998 regulations not mere......
-
Freeman v Lockett
...under s.21 of that Act, which regime has been analysed in the cases of Firth v. G O Ackroyd Junior Ltd [2001] PIQR Q4; Bell v. Todd [2002] PIQR P11 and Ryan v. Liverpool City Council [2002] Lloyds Rep Med 23. 18 S.17 of the Health and Social Services and Social Security Adjudications Act 19......
-
Crofton v National Health Service Litigation Authority
... ... that he now has the mental age of a young child. He has very limited mobility and speech, and his ... Blind) and paid for by Hampshire County Council (“the Council”). The judge accepted the ... to section 21 of NAA in R v Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council, ex parte Help the Aged [1997] 4 ... In Bell v Todd and others [2002] Lloyds LR Med 12 , following ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results