B.S. & N. Ltd (BVI) v Micado Shipping Ltd (Malta) (Seaflower)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 2000 |
Year | 2000 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha (The Golden Victory) [QBD (Comm)]
...the Arbitrator said he was constrained by the decision of Timothy Walker J in B.S.&N. Ltd v Micado Shipping Ltd (The "Seaflower") [2000] 2 Lloyd's Rep 37 to decide otherwise. Submissions by GSC 11 Mr Hamblen's submissions, in my summary, were to the following effect: i) The law "prescribes......
-
Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha (the "Golden Victory")
... ... to follow Timothy Walker J's decision in BS & N Ltd (BVI) v Micado Shipping Ltd (Malta) ("The Seaflower") [2000] 2 Lloyd's Rep 37 which he found to ... ...
-
Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha (the "Golden Victory")
...dated 27 th October 2004, had he not felt constrained to take the shorter term by first instance authority ( B. S. & N. Ltd. v. Micado Shipping Ltd. (Malta) ("The Seaflower") [2000] 2 Ll.R. 37 (Timothy Walker J). However, on appeal to the Commercial Court, Langley J by judgment and order da......