B v B (Financial Provision)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1990 |
| Date | 1990 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
C v F
...(1990) 1 FLR 140 in the Court of Appeal, and two decisions at first instance referred to by Mr Singer, namely of Ward, J in B v B (1990) 1 FLR 20, and of Stephen Brown, J, in Richards v Richards 1989, 53. Hunter JA then summarized the guideline and principles from these English authorities ......
-
H v H
...payable will not alter in the meantime. All of the assumptions are necessary simplifications which will not materialise: as Ward LJ said in B v B [1990] 1 FLR 20 ' the only certainty is that it will not happen as we have predicted'. […] The assumptions include three key financial prediction......
-
J.D. v D.D. (Judicial Separation)
...J.D. v. D.D. (Judicial Separation) J.D. Applicant and D.D. Respondent Cases mentioned in this report:— B. v. B. (Financial Provision) [1990] 1 F.L.R. 20. Duxbury v. Duxbury [1987] 1 F.L.R. 7. F. v. F. (Judicial Separation) [1995] 2 I.R. 354. Gojkovic v. Gojkovic [1990] 1 F.L.R. 140. H.D. V.......
-
JL v SL
...payable will not alter in the meantime. All of the assumptions are necessary simplifications which will not materialise: as Ward LJ said in B v B [1990] 1 FLR 20 ' the only certainty is that it will not happen as we have predicted'. […] The assumptions include three key financial prediction......
Request a trial to view additional results