B. v B. (Injunction: Jurisdiction)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1997
Year1997
CourtFamily Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
20 cases
  • G v A (Financial Remedy: Enforcement) (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
  • Gough and Another v Chief Constable of Derbyshire; R (Miller) v Leeds Magistrates' Court; Lilley v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 13 July 2001
    ...paragraph 63 of the judgment, and the Master of the Rolls' citations from the judgment of Lord Bingham CJ as he then was in ( B Divisional Court, 5 April 2000)). 7037 As I have acknowledged, many court orders may serve both a punitive and a preventive or protective purpose. The use of impr......
  • Young v Young
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 3 February 2012
    ...of this nature under s37 of the 1981 Act (just as it applied analogously to an application for the issue of a writ ne exeat regno). 20 In B v B Wilson J considered an application made by a wife for an order to be made restraining the husband from leaving the jurisdiction until he had satisf......
  • Re B (A Child) (removal from jurisdiction: removal of family’s passports as coercive measure)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 June 2014
    ... ... a passport order) requiring someone to lodge their passport with the court or with some suitable custodian, for example the Tipstaff or a solicitor who has given the court an appropriate undertaking: see, for example, Re S (Financial Provision: Non-Resident) [1996] 1 FCR 148 , B v B (Injunction: Restraint on Leaving Jurisdiction) [1997] 2 FLR 148 , Young v Young [2012] EWHC 138 (Fam) , [2012] 2 FLR 470 , and Bhura v Bhura [2012] EWHC 3633 (Fam) , [2013] 2 FLR 44 ... The question is as to the ambit of this power, in particular where, as here, the power is sought to be exercised ... ...
  • Get Started for Free