Babcock v Lawson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1878 |
| Date | 1878 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
Chippewas of Sarnia Band v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., (1999) 101 O.T.C. 1 (SC)
...to. [para. 674, footnote 356]. Pilcher v. Rawlins (1872), L.R. 7 Ch. App. 259, folld. [para. 686, footnote 359]. Babcock v. Lawson (1880), 5 Q.B.D. 284 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 688, footnote Kingu v. Walmar Ventures Ltd. (1986), 38 C.C.L.T. 51 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 688, footnote 361]. ......
-
Kathryn Bassano (Grantor/Claimant) v Alfred Toft (First Defendant) Peter Biddulph and Peter Biddulph Ltd (Second Defendants) Borro Loan Ltd and Borro Loan 2 Ltd (Third Defendants)
...(1866) LR 1 QB 585 it was held that a sub pledge by the pledgee does not destroy the pledge or the pledgee's special interest. 52 In Babcock v Lawson (1880) 5 QBD 284, the Court of Appeal held that a pledgee did not lose his special interest when he surrendered the goods back to the pledgor......
-
Society of Lloyd's v Leighs [QBD (Comm)]
... ... The following cases were referred to in the judgment: Adams v Dunn [1978] CrimLR 365 ... Babcock v LawsonELR (1880) 5 QBD 284 ... Bedford Insurance v IRBELR [1985] QB 966 ... Canada Steamship Lines Ltd v ... ...
-
Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson
...The classic instance of a person with a voidable title is a person who acquired the goods by fraud: see Bramwell LJ in Babcock v Lawson (1880) 5 QBD 284, 286. Further, this course is supported by writers of the distinction of Sir Jack Beatson: see Anson's Law of Contract, 28th edition, p 33......
Request a trial to view additional results