Baden et Al, Creditors of Philip late Earl of Pembroke, Plaintiffs; The Earl of Pembroke, Countess Dowager of Pembroke, Domina Charlotta Herbert, sole Daughter and Heir of Philip late Earl of Pembroke, and al', Defendants

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1688
Date01 January 1688
CourtHigh Court of Chancery

English Reports Citation: 23 E.R. 644

IN COURT, LORD CHANCELLOR; MASTER OF THE ROLLS; JUSTICE LUTWICH; AND JUSTICE POWELL.

Baden & al', Creditors of Philip late Earl of Pembroke
Plaintiffs
The Earl of Pembroke, Countess Dowager of Pembroke, Domina Charlotta Herbert, sole Daughter and Heir of Philip late Earl of Pembroke, and al'
Defendants.

[52] Case 50.-baden & al', Creditors of philip late Earl of pembroke, Plaintiffs; The Earl of pembroke, Countess Dowager of pembroke, domina charlotta herbert, sole Daughter and Heir of philip late Earl of pembroke, and al', Defendants.(I) Lunce, 21 Maii [1688]. In Court, Lord Chancellor ò Master of the Bolls ; Justice Lutwich ; and Justice Powell. Post, Case 196. A. on his marriage demises lands to B. who redemises them to A. for a lesser term, paying a pepper-corn rent during the life of A. and after his death an annual sum for the life of his wife for her jointure, and a pepper-corn for the remainder of the term. A. dies indebted, the redemised term shall not be assets to pay any debts but what affect the inheritance, the term redemised being raised for a particular purpose. This cause coming now before the court upon a case stated by Dr. Edisbury for the judgment of the court, how far the several terms for years after mentioned should be assets, and liable to debts by simple contract: the master certified, that Philip late Earl of Pembroke being seised in fee of the manors and lands after mentioned in consideration of the marriage then intended to be had betwixt him and the now countess Dowager of Pembroke, and of ten thousand pounds, which he then received as a portion with her, and in pursuance and performance of certain articles of agreement made before the marriage, whereby the said Earl covenanted and agreed to charge his estate in Glamorganshire with the payment of a rent or annuity of one thousand and three hundred pounds per annum, to the said Countess for her life, and for performance of those articles, became bound to the Earl of Sunderland, in a statute staple of the penalty of twenty thousand pounds; and the said late Earl having agreed to make up the one thousand three hundred pounds, one thousand five hundred pounds per annum, did, by [53] indenture dated 1 October (75) made between the said late Earl and the said Countess of the one part, and the said Earl of Sunderland and Lord Godolphin of the other part, grant, bargain, sell, and demise to the said Earl of Sunderland and Lord Godolphin, their executors and administrators, all his honours, manors, &c., in Glamorganshire, for ninety-nine years, under the rent of a pepper-corn : but upon trust that they should redemise the premises in manner after mentioned; and accordingly the said Earl of Sunderland and Lord Godolphin, by their indenture of redemise be'aring date the second day of the said October, made between them of the one part, and the said Earl of Pembroke of the other part, did in pursuance and performance of their said trust and for five shillings in money, regrant the said premises so demised, to the said Earl Philip : to 2 VEEN. 54. BADEN V. PEMBROKE (EARL of) 645 hold to him, his executors, administrators, and assigns for ninety-eight years and eleven months, reserving the rent of a pepper-corn only, during the life of the said Earl, and after his decease a rent of one thousand five hundred pounds per annum by half yearly payments, during the life of the Countess, as a jointure for her; and after her death a pepper-corn during the residue' of the term, with a covenant for payment of the rent, and a clause of re-entry in case of any default in payment. And the master in like manner stated several other securities that had been...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Dillon v Parker
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 4 Mayo 1822
    ...Chol-mondeley v. Clinton, 2 Mer. 350-357, and the cases cited, p. 209, 233, 234, 273, 329, to which may be added Baden v. Earl of Pembroke, 2 Vern. 52, 213 ; 1 P. W. 281, and the dictum Mas. 257. (2) That ca.Sn on the question of election ia not reported, but is referred to in Lady Cavan v.......
  • William Pulteney, Esq., and Frances his wife, Plaintiffs; The Earl of Darlington and Others, Defendants
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 24 Marzo 1783
    ...heads. First, With respect to assets : the money so fully becomes land, as not to be assets to pay debts, Baden v. the Earl of Pembroke, 2 Vern. 52 ; Lawrence v. Beberly, 2 Keble, 841, cited 2 Vern. 55. Second, As to courtesy : where the feme-[227]~covert is an equitable tenant in tail, the......
  • Heir and Ancestor
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 1 Enero 1744
    ...1692, decreed, Hoskins and Savoy, S. P., 2 Vern. 213, 215. Baden and Countess of Pembroke. (S. 0. but not S. P. ante [1 Eq. Ca. Abr.], 241; 2 Vern. 52; 3 Oh. Rep. 217). (If a Man for £ 100 assumes to make a Lease for 21 Years, and dies ; his Heir is not compellable, in a Court of Equity, t......
  • Executors and Administrators
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 1 Enero 1744
    ...to any other Debts than the Inheritance was ; and decreed accordingly. Pasch. 1688, Baden & al' and the Countess Dowager of Pembroke, 2 Vern. 52. 4. By the Statute of Frauds and Perjuries, the Trust of an Inheritance is made Assets at Law, but the Trust of a Term is not; and by a Clause in ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT