Badry v DPP

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1982
Date1982
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
29 cases
  • General Medical Council v British Broadcasting Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 Junio 1998
    ...point, and his brief judgment (which refers to "the lateness of the hour") does not refer to any authorities as having been cited. 30In Badry v D.P.P. [1983] 2 A.C. 297, 307, Lord Hailsham said that Attorney-General v BBC "plainly established … that, in the absence of statutory provision t......
  • Attorney-General v Shadrake Alan
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 3 Noviembre 2010
    ...effect of the publication. Times Newspaper was not cited to the Privy Council in Lutchmeeparsad Badry v Director of Public Prosecutions [1983] 2 AC 297 (“Badry”), an appeal from Mauritius where the Board considered at 304 that “nothing has intervened in the past 80 years to invalidate the a......
  • DPP of Mauritius v Hurnam
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 25 Abril 2007
    ...v The Queen [1914] AC 599, 614-5, per Lord Sumner. It was adopted and followed by the Board in Badry v Director of Public Prosecutions [1983] 2 AC 297 in deciding the first appeal as of right from Mauritius under section 70A of the Courts Act. The Board again accepted the applicability of......
  • Attorney General v Wain and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 11 Enero 1991
    ...law of contempt of court in the administration of justice in England. This fact is noted by Lord Hailsham LC in Badry v DPP of Mauritius [1983] 2 AC 297 at p 303; [1982] 3 All ER 973 at p 978 where in dealing with the contempt of scandalizing the court, he said: `In the United Kingdom the l......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Administrative and Constitutional Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2010, December 2010
    • 1 Diciembre 2010
    ...in some cases such as Wain and Tan Liang Joo (above, para 1.92) on R v Gray [1900] 2 QB 36 which Badry v Director of Public Prosecutions [1983] 2 AC 297 (‘Badry’) interpreted as requiring the consideration of the potential effect of the impugned publications in the circumstances in which it......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT