Baker v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1975 |
| Date | 1975 |
| Year | 1975 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
104 cases
-
R (Kadhim) v Brent London Borough Council Housing Benefit Review Board
...did not silently assume, the contraverted proposition. 29 Before us, however, a wider argument was developed. Mr Cox first took us to Baker v R [1975] AC 774, in which Lord Diplock said, at p 788B, that, because the Board does not usually permit points to be raised before it that had not be......
-
Smith v Police Commissioner
...Cases cited: (1) Associated Provncl. Picture Houses Ltd. v. Wednesbury Corp., [1948] 1 K.B. 223; 1947] 2 All E.R. 680. (2) Baker v. R., [1975] A.C. 774; [1975] 3 All E.R. 55; (1975), 13 J.L.R. 169, dicta of Lord Diplock applied. (3) Banks v. Transport Regulation Bd. (Victoria)UNK(1968), 119......
-
Goh Cheng Chuan v Public Prosecutor
...was in error. First, it is not open to a court to invoke the per incuriam rule against a court of superior jurisdiction. In Baker v R [1975] AC 774 at p 788, Lord Diplock in delivering the judgment of the Board said: Strictly speaking the per incuriam rule as such, while it justifies a cour......
-
Peart (Shabadine) v R
...in the oft' quoted passage in Director of Public Prosecutions v Nasralla 1967 2 All E.R. 161. It was cited by Lord Diplock in Baker v R. (1973) 13 J.L.R. 169 at 177 thus: "This chapter [Chapter 111 of which section 26(8) forms part] ... proceeds upon the presumption that the fundamental rig......
Request a trial to view additional results