Ballett v Mingay
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1943 |
| Year | 1943 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Attorney General and Transport Authority v Aston Burey
...to these torts. Firstly, in a claim for detinue, it is no defence that the defendant parted with the chattel before demand – see Ballett v Mingay [1943] 1 K.B. 281; [1943] 1 All ER 143. Secondly, where a claimant seeks only the return of the chattel he is limited to bring his action only in......
-
Reverand Dr Ralph Griffiths v Attorney General for Jamaica and Transport Authority
...Counsel also referred the court to the cases Attorney General & Transport Authority v Aston Burey, Jones v Dowie (1841) 9 M&W 19, and Ballett v Mingay [1943] 1 ALL ER 143 (CA), and submitted that if the chattel is not ordered to be returned, the ordinary measure of damages is the value of ......
-
Baldwin v Quest
...to these torts. Firstly, in a claim for detinue, it is no defence that the defendant parted with the chattel before demand – see Ballett v Mingay [1943] 1 K.B. 281 ; [1943] 1 All ER 143. Secondly, where a claimant seeks only the return of the chattel he is limited to bring his action onl......
-
Royal Bank of Canada v. Robinson, (1997) 208 A.R. 253 (ProvCt)
...being an act of the kind contemplated by it, then the infant is liable.' Lord Greene, M.R., applied the sage test in Ballett v. Mingay , [1943] K.B. 281, 112 LJKB 193, to distinguish Jennings v. Rundle , supra, and Burnard v. Haggis supra. There an infant was sued in detinue for failing to ......