Bamford v A.T.A. Advertising Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 27 March 1972 |
| Date | 27 March 1972 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
- Practice Direction (Divorce Decree Absolute)
-
Stephen Hoey & Others v Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs
...limits to this – for instance, the firm cannot pay the employee's PAYE tax for him and claim to deduct it as an expense: see Bamford v ATA Advertising Co Ltd [1972] 1 WLR 1261. But, in general, money laid out in order to secure the continued loyal service of the workforce is referable only......
-
MacKinlay v Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Company
...limits to this — for instance, the firm cannot pay the employee's PAYE tax for him and claim to deduct it as an expense (see Bamford v. A.T.A. Advertising Ltd. [1972] 1 W.L.R. 1261). But, in general, money laid out in order to secure the continued loyal service of the workforce is referabl......
-
Bamford (HM Inspector of Taxes) v A.T.A. Advertising Ltd
...you ask. Medd-If your Lordship pleases. [Solicitors:-Solicitor of Inland Revenue; Harold G. Walker & Co., Bournemouth.] 1 Reported [1972] 1 W.L.R. 1261; 116 S.J. 508; [1972] 3 All E.R. 2 Read £15,544; see pages 368-9 post. 1 1928 S.C. 701. 1 13 T.C. 864, at p. 870. 2 9 T.C. 319. 3 13 T.C. 8......
Request a trial to view additional results