Banger (EEA: EFM - right of appeal)

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Neutral Citation[2019] UKUT 194 (IAC)
Date2019
Year2019
CourtUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • L -v- Minister for Justice
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 31 October 2019
    ...The decision of the Upper Tribunal (Lane J. and Judge Rimington) was, it appears, delivered on 10 April 2019, and is to be found at [2019] UKUT 194 (IAC). At para. 40 of the judgment, it is stated:- “40 There are two points which indicate from the judgment that a full merits appeal and thus......
  • Bhavsar (Late Application for PTA: Procedure)
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 12 April 2019
    ...UKUT 194 (IAC)" class="content__heading content__heading--depth1"> [2019] UKUT 194 (IAC) UPPER TRIBUNAL (IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER) Lane J (President) and Rimington UTJBanger (EEA: EFM – Right of Appeal) Representation Mr E Metcalfe instructed by the Government Legal Department, for th......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2019-04-10, [2019] UKUT 194 (IAC) (Banger (EEA: EFM - Right of Appeal))
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 10 April 2019
    ...so-language: ar-SA } a:link { color: #0563c1 } Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Banger (EEA: EFM - Right of Appeal) [2019] UKUT 00194(IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House 20th March 2019 Decision promulgated on: Before THE PRESIDENT, THE HON. MR JUSTICE LANE UPPER T......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2020-04-01, EA/06860/2018
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 1 April 2020
    ...was no response from the Respondent on the court file. 18. The Appellants submit that following Banger (EEA: EFM – Right of Appeal) [2019] UKUT 000194 (IAC) the second Appellant could request a new decision from the Respondent or rely on the doctrine of direct effect. Mr Nicholson relied in......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT