Bank of New Zealand v Simpson

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1900
Year1900
Date1900
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
72 cases
  • Dse (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Intertan Inc.
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Citicorp Investment Bank (Singapore) Ltd v Wee Ah Kee
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 22 May 1997
    ...discharged the loan, the bank was not entitled to retain the remaining shares: at [80], [86] and [87]. Bank of New Zealand v Simpson [1900] AC 182 (folld) Chew Tong Shing v Hotel Royal Ltd [1992] 2 SLR (R) 320; [1992] 2 SLR 787 (distd) G & C Kreglinger v New Patagonia Meat and Cold Storage ......
  • China Insurance Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd (formerly known as Liberty Citystate Insurance Pte Ltd)
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 28 February 2005
    ...Sales Ltd ([52] supra) per Lord Wilberforce at 261, as well as the Australian Privy Council decision of Bank of New Zealand v Simpson [1900] AC 182. In the present case, there was much debate as to what subject matter and risk the plaintiff’s and the defendant’s policies covered. Looked at ......
  • Paul Pora v Poliamba Limited (2008) N3582
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • 22 August 2008
    ...Gillespie Bros. & Co v Cheney Eggar & Co [1896] 2 Q.B. 59; Bank of Australia v. Palmer [1897] AC 540; Bank of New Zealand v Simpson [1900] A.C.182; Reliance Marine Insurance v. Duder [1913] 1 KB 265; Jacobs v Batavia & General Plantations Trust Ltd [1924] 1 Ch.287; Tsang Chuen v. Li Po Kwai......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Contract formation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume I - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...v Brady [2019] EWHC 2184 (TCC) at [239]–[245], per Jeford J. 110 A written ofer may be accepted orally: Bank of New Zealand v Simpson [1900] 1 AC 182 at 185 (PC). 111 Haden Young Ltd v Laing O’Rourke Midlands Ltd [2008] EWHC 1016 (TCC) at [122]–[123], per Ramsey J; Arcadis Consulting (UK) L......
  • General Principles of Interpretation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Interpretation of Agreements
    • 4 August 2020
    ...Ltd v Persimmons Homes Ltd , [2009] AC 1101 (HL). 29 See, for example, The Curfew , [1891] P 131; Bank of New Zealand v Simpson , [1900] AC 182; Alampi v Swartz, [1964] 1 OR 488 (CA) [ Alampi ]; Leitch Gold Mines Ltd v Texas Gulf Sulphur Co , [1969] 1 OR 469 at 534 (HCJ) [ Leitch Gold Mines......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT