Bank St Petersburg OJSC and another v Arkhangelsky and another

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date2014
Year2014
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
19 cases
  • Wong, Wen-Young v (1) Grand View Private Trust Company Ltd, (2) Transglobe Private Trust Company Ltd
    • Bermuda
    • Supreme Court (Bermuda)
    • 22 June 2022
    ...are out of proportion to his fault. 571. Moreover, as Longmore LJ held in Bank of St Petersburg v Arkhangelsky [2014] EWCA Civ 593, [2014] 1 WLR 4360 [24]: the court has to look at all the circumstances in order to decide whether the application of the foreign limitation period will cause......
  • Wikeley v Kea Investments Ltd
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 21 November 2024
    ...at [84] and [87]. 177 Ellerman Lines Ltd v Read [1928] 2 KB 144 (CA); and Bank St Petersburg OJSC v Arkhangelsky [2014] EWCA Civ 593, [2014] 1 WLR 4360. 178 SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd, above n 179 Interim injunction judgment, above n 8, at [68]. At that point in the judgme......
  • Kamil Najim Abdullah Alseran and Another v MRE and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 14 December 2017
    ...with reasonable diligence and with knowledge of its potential application." In Bank St Petersburg v Arkhangelsky [2014] EWCA Civ 593, [2014] 1 WLR 4360, para 19, the Court of Appeal agreed with this description of the question and also cited as providing relevant guidance the other authori......
  • Kazakhstan Kagazy Plc v Baglan Abdullayevich Zhunus (formerly Baglan Abdullayevich Zhunussov)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 21 December 2021
    ...was cited, in the context of the 1984 Act, by the Court of Appeal in Bank of St Petersburg v Arkhangelsky [2014] EWCA Civ 593, [2014] 1 WLR 4360 (§ 20). Picken J at § 557 stated it to be clear that the question of undue hardship should be approached on the basis that it had that meaning. ......
  • Get Started for Free