Banque Keyser Ullmann SA v Skandia (UK) Insurance Company Ltd (No. 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1988 |
| Date | 1988 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Frédéric Marino v FM Capital Partners Ltd
...by this Court in Townsend v Stone Toms & Partners (1984) 27 BLR 26 and by Steyn J in Banque Keyser Ullman v Skandia Insurance (No. 2) [1988] 2 All E.R. 880 at 882b. He submitted that, while those cases, which the judge considered, and the approach of this Court in Oak Tree Leisure Ltd v R.......
-
Barings Plc ((in Liquidation)) v Coopers & Lybrand (No. 7)
...Both parties referred me to the cases of Townsend v Stone Toms (1984) 27 BLR 26 and Banque Keyser Ullman v Skandia Insurance (No. 2) [1988] 2 All ER 880. In Townsend, one defendant (D1) made a payment into court which was accepted by the claimant. The other defendant (D2) argued that it was......
-
Otkritie International Investment Management Ltd and Others v Georgy Urumov (Also Known as George Urumov) and Others
...and credit must be given in favour of D2 only for the excess necessarily referable to the overlapping claim: Banque Keyser Ullman SA v Skandia (UK) Insurance Co Ltd (No 2) [1988] 2 All ER 880, 882b per Steyn J. vi) Sixth, whilst in Townsend the Court of Appeal upheld the Judge's approach, ......
-
Julian Richard Stevenson and Another v Surjit Singh and Others
...Mr. Rahman. In support of that submission Mr. Douthwaite drew to my attention some observations of Steyn J in Banque Keyser Ullman SA v. Skandia (UK) Insurance Co. Ltd. (No.2) [1988] 2 All ER 880 at page 882:— " The first live issue, as between Chemical and Skandia, is whether the costs of ......
Request a trial to view additional results