Barings Plc ((in Liquidation)) v Coopers & Lybrand (No. 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2001 |
| Year | 2001 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
42 cases
-
New Falmouth Resorts Ltd v International Hotels Jamaica
...... IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA IN COMMON LAW SUIT NO. C. L. 2002/N0900 . BETWEEN NEW ...from the case of Barings Pic (in Liquidation) and another vs. Coopers and Lybrand (a firm) and others; Barings Futures (Singapore) ......
-
Ormiston Arnold Boyea Hudson Willliams Claimants v Eastern Caribbean Flour Mills Ltd Defendant [ECSC]
......-2 EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE HIGH COURT ... (b) The Court has no jurisdiction to exclude admissible evidence ...932 ; and Barings PLC et al v Coopers and Lybrand [2001] Lloyds ......
-
Bank St Petersburg and Another v Vitaly Arkhangelsky and Another Oslo Marine Ports LLC (Part 20 Claimant)
...of reference). The Claimants submit it is not required, and is not appropriate. 94 As explained by Evans-Lombe J in Barings Plc v Coopers & Lybrand (No. 2) [2001] Ll Rep. Bank. 85: "Expert evidence is admissible under section 3 of the Civil Evidence Act 1972 in any case where the court acce......
-
Lucy Jane McCallum-Toppin v Alistair Bruce McCallum-Toppin
...executives such as Alistair and Allan were and are was a proper subject of expert evidence. 89 In the words of Evans-Lombe J in Barings plc v Coopers & Lybrand [2001] PNLR 22, [45], it was “a recognised expertise governed by recognised standards and rules of conduct capable of influencing ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Expert evidence: is it needed, when will the court allow it and the importance of staying engaged throughout the proceedings
...of the operational guidance set out in the VPs. The defendants objected and relied on the judgment in Barings Plc v. Coopers & Lybrand [2001] PNLR 22. While acknowledging that the expert was no doubt distinguished in his field, the defendants argued that his evidence did not come within the......