Barnet London Borough Council v AL

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2017] EWHC 125 (Fam)
Date2017
Year2017
CourtFamily Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • AB (A Child)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Court
    • 16 January 2018
    ...the 1989 Act as entitling it to authorise medical treatment opposed by parents who also have parental responsibility: see Barnet London Borough Council v AL and others [2017] EWHC 125 (Fam), [2017] 4 WLR 53, para 32, and the discussion in Re C (Children: Power to Choose Forenames) [2016] E......
  • London Borough of Tower Hamlets v M
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 7 February 2020
    ...for declaratory relief. Mr Barnes gives particular emphasis to the judgment of MacDonald J in Re SL (Permission to vaccinate) [2017] EWHC 125 (Fam): “ 33. In this case the court is concerned with the issue of vaccinations in the context of children who are the subject of care orders and th......
  • A Father v A Mother and In the matter of Finn (a minor) (specific issue: vaccination)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division (Northern Ireland)
    • 30 July 2020
    ...responsibility pursuant to Article 52(3) the Children Order. That was the issue in play in Barnet London Borough Council v AL and others [2017] 4 WLR 53. Of course, private law is different as King LJ says at paragraph 94: “94. Regardless of whether immunisations should or should not contin......
  • M (Children) (Specific Issue Order: Guardian's Application to Enforce)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Court
    • Invalid date
    ...in public lawand specific issue circumstances is clear and indeed since my judgment MacDonald J in BarnetLondon Borough Council v AL [2017] EWHC 125 (Fam); [2017] 4 WLR 53 has delivered a furtherjudgment in a care context reinforcing the weight of judicial view. It remains therefore my view......
1 books & journal articles
  • Parental Responsibility
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Child Care and Protection Law and Practice - 6th Edition Contents
    • 29 August 2019
    ...the medical treatment of a child if this is adjudged to be in the child’s best interests. The case of Re SL (Permission to Vaccinate) [2017] EWHC 125 (Fam) is a helpful illustration of the use of the inherent jurisdiction. Here, the local authority had applied under the inherent jurisdictio......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT