Barnett v Hickmott

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1895
Year1895
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 11 October 2001
    ...that the bedrooms were separately occupied as dwelling houses for the purpose of the franchise. The decision was later doubted (see Barnett v Hickmott [1895] 1 QB 691) but only because of the existence of the communal dining room. No doubt was cast on the decision in so far as it involved ......
  • Steele v Mahon
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 16 November 1909
    ... ... [Counsel referred to Cook v. Humber ( 4 ); Thompson v. Ward ( 5 ); Boon v. Howard ( 6 ), and Barnett v. Hickmott ( 7 ).] Sullivan, K.C. , in reply:— Torish v. Love ( 3 ) is a conclusive decision that the existence of ... ...
  • University of Bath
    • United Kingdom
    • Value Added Tax Tribunal
    • 7 May 1996
    ...Tribunal University of Bath The following cases were referred to in the decision: Barnett v Hickmott ELR[1895] 1 QB 691 C & E Commrs v Link Housing Association LtdVAT[1992] BVC 113 Re Hecquard, ex parte Hecquard ELR(1889) 24 QBD 71 St Catherine's College v Dorling UNK[1979] 3 All ER 250 Str......
  • Ladd v O'Toole
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 17 November 1903
    ...443. (3) [1900] 2 I. R. 455. (1) 22 L. R. Ir. 443. (2) 18 L. R. Ir. 68. (3) 16 Q. B. D. 246. (4) Ante, 383. (5) [1900] 2 I. R. 455. (6) [1895] 1 Q. B. 691. (7) [1894] 2 I. R. at p. (8) 6 Ir. Jur. (N. S.) 109. (9) 7 Ir. Jur. (N. S.) 175. (10) [1896] 1 Q. B. 395. (11) 2 Lawson, 55. (1) 22 L. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT