Baron v Portslade Urban Council
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1900 |
| Year | 1900 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
RHM Bakeries (Northern) v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
...p. 188 in which public authorities have been held liable for nonfeasance. One of these is Baron v. Portslade Urban District CouncilELR[1900] 2 Q.B. 588 where the Lord Chancellor pointed out the distinction between the duty of local authority under section 19 of the Public Health Act 1875 to......
-
Southern Gas Networks Plc v Thames Water Utilities Ltd
...is wrong, for two reasons. 75 First, it elides the duty to maintain a sewer with the duty to cleanse it, whereas, in Baron v Portslade Urban District Council [1900] 2 QB 588, the Court of Appeal held that, although there was no common law right of action in nuisance in respect of a failure ......
-
Marcic v Thames Water Utilities Ltd
...exclude common law remedies for common law torts, such as a nuisance arising from failure to keep a sewer properly cleaned: Baron v Portslade Urban District Council [1900] 2 QB 588. But the courts consistently held that failure to construct new sewers was not such a 55 The principal author......
-
Pride of Derby and Derbyshire Angling Association Ltd and Earl of Harrington v British Celanese Ltd
...its sewers, andthus caused a nuisance to the plaintiff. It was held by this Court that they were liable to an action; see Baron v. Partslade Urban District Council, 1900 volume 2 Queen's Bench Division, page 588. Finally, in 1943 the Islington Borough Council had taken over a disused tramwa......
Request a trial to view additional results