Barr v Ingram
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Date | 1977 |
| Year | 1977 |
| Court | High Court of Justiciary |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Procurator Fiscal, Linlithgow V. Jamie Borland
...he was ready, obtaining an adjournment where he was not. Counsel cited Hume's Commentaries vol. ii at page 263, quoted in Barr v. Ingram 1977 S.L.T. 173 at 176, to the effect that the prosecutor "ought to be finally resolved, and fully prepared, before he stir in a matter of such importance......
-
McDONALD v HM ADVOCATE
...to consider these cases. For the record those cited and referred to were:Hull v. H.M. AdvocateSC 1945 J.C. 83; Barr v. IngramUNK, 1977 S.L.T. 173; Law and Nicol v. H.M. Advocate 1973 S.L.T. (Notes) 14; H.M. Advocate v. McDonaldSC 1984 J.C. 94, Pettigrew v. IngramUNK1982 S.L.T. 435. Had I a ......
-
Heywood v Stewart
...incapable of being cured. There is ample authority to support this view. As Lord Justice-General Emslie pointed out in Barr v. IngramUNK 1977 S.L.T. 173, at p. 176, it has been clearly established by an anthology of decisions that where a diet is adjourned to another day the adjournment mus......
-
Ruxton v Borland
...on the respondent's plea to the competency of the proceedings proceed before Sheriff Hector Maclean. Cases referred to: Barr v Ingram 1977 SLT 173 Handley v PirieSC 1976 JC 65 Mitchell v Vannet 1999 SLT 934 Starrs v Ruxton; Ruxton v StarrsSC2000 JC 208 Textbook referred to: Hume, Crimes (3r......
Request a trial to view additional results