Barratt v Robinson

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Neutral Citation[2014] UKUT 322 (LC)
Date2014
Year2014
CourtUpper Tribunal (Lands Chamber)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • No. 1 West India Quay (Residential) Ltd v East Tower Apartments Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 July 2021
    ...of the preparation and service of such a notice.” 53 The Deputy President then referred, at [62], to a decision of his own in Barrett v Robinson [2014] UKUT 322 (LC), [2015] L. & T. R. 1, where he had held that a clause permitting the recovery of costs incurred in, or in contemplation of, ......
  • LVT/0026/08/14: 11 Llannerch Hall, St Asaph
    • United Kingdom
    • Leasehold Valuation Tribunals
    • 24 July 2015
    ...leading up to and including this LVT case. 45. The Respondents disputed this and relied instead on the case of Barrett v Robinson [2014] UKUT 0322 (LC). Mr Warren referred to section 81 of the Housing Act 1996 which restricts a landlord from seeking the forfeiture of a lease of residential ......
  • The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets v Ali Jivaraj Khan
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 June 2022
    ...strictly costs of the proceedings they appear to have been incidental to the preparation of the requisite notices and schedules.” 33 In Barrett v Robinson [2014] UKUT 322 (LC), [2015] L&TR 1, Martin Rodger QC, the Deputy President of the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), noted in paragraph ......
  • Kensquare Ltd v Mary Adwoa Akyaa Boakye
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 November 2021
    ...of previous cases, including Freeholders of 69 Marina, St Leonards-on-Sea v Oram [2011] EWCA Civ 1258, [2012] L&TR 4 (“ 69 Marina”), Barrett v Robinson [2014] UKUT 322 (LC) (“ Barrett”) and Willens v Influential Consultants Ltd [2015] UKUT 362 (LC) (“ Willens”), Judge Cooke said in parag......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT