Barrett v Hartley
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1865 |
| Date | 1865 |
| Court | Equity |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
6 cases
-
Guinness Plc v Saunders and Another
...the rule that no inquiry on that subject is permitted." 25 So far as equity is concerned, Sir John Stuart V.-C. in Barrett v. Hartley (1866) L.R. 2 Eq. 789 said, at p. 796, that there was a: "very well established principle of this court that a trustee is not to exact anything for his servi......
-
Noelle Elizabeth Hillman v Lynda Box, Debrah Box and Skye Box as Executors of the Estate of Graeme William Box
...Ltd v Alirezai [2004] QCA 6 Bank of New South Wales v Rogers (1941) 65 CLR 42 Barbaro v The Queen (2014) 305 ALR 323 Barrett v Hartley (1866) LR 2 Eq 789 Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 Blore v Lang (1960) 104 CLR 124 Burgess v Rawnsley [1975] Ch 429 Burton v Camden London Bor......
-
Taueki v Procter - Horowhenua 11 Lake Block (2020) 415 Aotea MB 1 (415 AOT 1)
...[1967] 2 AC 134, [1966] 3 All ER 721 Re Thompson’s Settlement [1986] Ch 99 at 115 Robinson v Pett (1734) 3P Wms 249 Barrett v Hartley (1866) LR 2 Eq 789 Rochefoucauld v Boustead [1898] 1 Ch 550 Willis v Barron [1902] AC 271 (HL) Re Macadam [1945] 2 All ER 664 J D Heydon and M J Leeming Jaco......
-
Kinnon and Kinnon v Hong
...2 AC 134, [1966] 3 All ER 721. Re Thompson’s Settlement [1986] Ch 99 at 115. Robinson v Pett (1734) 3P Wms 249. Barrett v Hartley (1866) LR 2 Eq 789. Rochefoucauld v Boustead [1898] 1 Ch 550 Willis v Barron [1902] AC 271 (HL). Re Macadam [1945] 2 All ER 664. is an agreement with all the tru......
Get Started for Free