BARRIE (LEON) v HM ADVOCATE; McKINNON (STEPHEN) v HM ADVOCATE; McKAY (ROSS) v HM ADVOCATE; NORWOOD (ALLAN) v HM ADVOCATE; JACKSON (JOHN) v HM ADVOCATE
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Date | 2002 |
| Court | High Court of Justiciary |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Green v HM Advocate
...[2009] HCJAC 89; 2010 JC 66; 2010 SLT 29; 2010 SCCR 103; 2010 SCL 198 Advocate (HM) v Mills 1935 JC 77; 1935 SLT 532 Barrie v HM Advocate 2002 SLT 1053 Bradford v McLeod 1986 SLT 244; 1985 SCCR 379; [1986] Crim LR 690 Brown v HM Advocate 1993 SCCR 382 Campbell v HM Advocate [2019] HCJAC 58;......
-
Notes Of Appeal Against Conviction And Sentence By (first) Paul Green, (second) Lee Noonan And (third) Robbie Darren Brown
...the clarity which might be expected in directions on such important issues, given the cross incriminations (see Barrie v HM Advocate 2002 SLT 1053 at para [7]). Mr Noonan [41] Mr Noonan submitted that the directions in relation to concert were inadequate. Clear directions on what was requir......
-
McKINNON v HM ADVOCATE
...charges. The pannels thereafter appealed to the High Court of Justiciary against conviction. Cases referred to: Barrie v HM Advocate 2002 SLT 1053 Boyne v HM Advocate 1980 SLT 56 Brown v HM AdvocateUNK 1993 SCCR 382 Coleman v HM AdvocateUNK 1999 SCCR 87 Docherty v HM AdvocateSC 1945 JC 89 M......
-
Jason Cassie V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...necessary. It would, if anything, have been unfavourable to the appellant. In the present case, unlike that of Barrie v. H.M. Advocate 2002 S.L.T. 1053, the sheriff did not require to deal with any suggestion that the appellant had been acting also in his own defence, and hence discriminate......
Request a trial to view additional results