Bates v Batey & Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1913
Date1913
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • M'Alister or Donoghue (Pauper) v Stevenson
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • May 26, 1932
    ...contract to make or repair what the employer intended to permit others to use in the way of his trade." 31In Bates v. Batey & Co. Ld., 1913, 3 K.B. 351, the defendants, ginger beer manufacturers, were held not liable to a consumer (who had purchased from a retailer one of their bottles) for......
  • Anglo-Celtic Shipping Company, Ltd v Elliott and Jeffery and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the King's Bench
    • Invalid date
  • Mullen v Barr & Company M'Gowan v Barr & Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • March 20, 1929
    ...in Winterbottom v. WrightENR, (1842) 10 M. & W. 109; Earl v. LubbockELR, [1905] 1 K. B. 253; Blacker, supra; Bates v. Batey & Co.ELR, [1913] 3 K. B. 351. … The same principle is also illustrated in the cases of Cavalier v. PopeELR, [1906] A. C. 428, and Cameron v. YoungELR, 1908 S. C. (H. L......
  • Cox v Burbridge
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Common Pleas
    • January 14, 1863
    ...Brady v. Warren, [1900] 2 I. R. 646; Sullivan v. Creed, [1904] 2 I. R. 321. See White v. Steadman, [1913] 3 K. B. 347; Bates v. Batey, [1913] 3 K. B. 351. 1 3 72 COX V. BUEBIDGE r Cox v. burbidge Jan. 14th, 1863. . [S. C. 32 L. J. C. P. 89; 9 Jur. N. S. 970; 11 W. R. 435. See MtrLr ' v.' Py......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT