Bath v Standard Land Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1911 |
| Date | 1911 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
-
Gregson v HAE Trustees Ltd and Others
...say something about the relevant authorities. 27 The earliest is the decision of the Court of Appeal in Bath v. Standard Land Co. Ltd. [1911] 1 Ch 618. It concerned an account between the owner of an estate and a company which acted as manager of the estate. One of the issues on the taking......
-
THG Plc & Others v Zedra Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd
...the general principle that the directors of a company owe fiduciary duties to the company and not to individual shareholders. In Bath v Standard Land Co Ltd [1911] 1 Ch 618, 627 Sir Herbert Cozens Hardy MR put it this way: “I base my decision upon the broad principle that directors stand i......
-
HM Revenue and Customs v Holland; Re Paycheck Services 3 Ltd
... ... were provided to clients through an agency which paid the parent company. The intention was to provide the same tax advantages to the non-voting ... It was used by Sir George Jessel MR in Re Canadian Land Reclaiming and Colonising Co, Coventry and Dixon's case (1880) 14 Ch D ... 57 In my judgment the decision of the House of Lords in Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corpn [2002] UKHL 43 ; ... ...
-
Mansard Mortgages 2007-2 Plc v Beyat Holdings Ltd
...come under fiduciary duties owed to the Noteholders. As Sir Herbert Cozens-Hardy MR said (with the concurrence of Buckley LJ) in Bath v Standard Land Company Ltd [1911] 1 Ch 618, 625–626 “Directors stand in a fiduciary relation to the company, but not to a stranger with whom the company is......
Request a trial to view additional results