Baynton v Hooper
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 29 January 1847 |
| Date | 29 January 1847 |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
English Reports Citation: 50 E.R. 546
ROLLS COURT
[168] baynton v. hooper. Jan. 29, 1847. Upon an application to the Court to appoint a guardian ad litem to an infant resident within the jurisdiction, his appearance in Court will not be dispensed with, unless under special circumstances. Mr. Bird applied for the appointment of a guardian ad litem of infant Defendants, (1) Darcy v. Hall, 1 Vernon, 49 ; Brathwaite v. Brathwaite, Ib. 334 ; Phillips v. Vaughan, Ib. 336; Williams v. Springfeild, Ib. 476; Long v. Clapton, Ib. 464 ; Ascough v. Johnson, 2 Vernon, 66; 1 Powell on Mortgages (6th ed.), 346 a.; Morret v. Paske, 2 Atkyns, 52. 10BEAV. 169. HOPKINSON V. ELLIS 547 òwho were resident within the jurisdiction, without either a commission or their personal appearance in Court. There were no special circumstances stated for deviating from the usual practice, except that the Plaintiff threatened an attachment. The Master of the Rolls, in the first instance, had made the order, but^ the registrar, before drawing it up, required that the matter should be drawn to the attention of the Court. Mr. Bird again mentioned the case, and referred to Drant v. Vatae (2 You. & òColl. (C. Q), 524). the master of the rolls [Lord Langdale] said he would consider the case; .hut on the following day he refused the order. [169] The children were brought into Court on the 1st of February, and a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Downs v Collins
...of the partnership property until the expiration of the partnership, without the consent of the other partner; (1) See Baynton v. Hooper^ 10 Beav, 168, where all the cases on the point are referred to. 6 HAKE, 419. DOWNS V. COLLINS 1229 empowering, also, each partner, either in his lifetime......