Baynton v South West Trains Ltd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Date | 2005 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Miss Margaret Malcolm V. Dundee City Council
...Public Prosecutions v Marshall [1998] ICR 518). Obviously this was not a concern in the present case. In Baynton v South West Trains Ltd [2005] ICR 1730 EAT, it was observed that a tribunal will err if, when refusing to exercise its discretion to extend time, it fails to recognise the absen......
-
Ms I Cetin v A Ltd and Mr B.C.: 3325658/2019
...trial of the issue is still possible (Director of Public Prosecutions v Marshall [1998] ICR 518). In Baynton v South West Trains Ltd [2005] ICR 1730 EAT, it was observed that a tribunal will err if, when refusing to exercise its discretion to extend time, it fails to recognise the absence o......
-
Mr P Hale v Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
...significant matter into account represents, in our judgment, an error of law, just as was the case in Baynton v South West Trains Ltd [2005] ICR 1730, EAT, HHJ Burke QC presiding (see particularly para Mr Matovu submits that, similarly, the prejudice in this case is all one way. Mr Kibling ......
-
Mr Y H El-Nahla v Top Discount Electrical Stores Ltd: 3335363/2018
...trial of the issue is still possible (Director of Public Prosecutions v Marshall [1998] ICR 518). In Baynton v South West Trains Ltd [2005] ICR 1730 EAT, it was observed that a tribunal will err if, when refusing to exercise its discretion to extend time, it fails to recognise the absence o......
Request a trial to view additional results