Bear & Hodges Case
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1657 |
| Date | 01 January 1657 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 124 E.R. 142
COMMON BANCK AND EXCHEQUER
bear & hodges case. Election, Harriot, Bayly. Pluis del Case de Bear & Hodges devant fol. Henden. Jeo conceive le Conusans bone. Le question est, quant reservacon est de Herriot ou 5 1. al elecon del Lessor, & le Bayly fait Conusans come Bayly generalfnt pur le Heriot, & ne dit, que le Lessor avoit fait eleccon, ou soiet bone? Et il teign que cy. Priraerment, pur ceo que il fait ceo come chose incident al son lieu. Sont several sorts de Baylies en un Aesise, &o. Primernoent, Bayly que est imediate party poet pleader touts pleas que va in excuse de le disseisin, mes nemy pleas que va in droit del Tenancy. Secundment, Baylie del Manner, que poet fair touts choses apperteignant al son lieu & account pur eux. Le Lessor mesrae icy puist aver fait avowry sans mrans de son eleccon. Et le Avowry ferra determination de son election, donque le Bayly feasans de Eleccon en son droit, est tout uti sil mesrae avoit fait ceo ; Mes le diversity est, que Bayly poet fairer ascun chose pur benefit de son master & estoiet bone, tanque il disagree. Mes si soiet al disadvantage, auterment. Pur ceo [71] un Baylie poet fair un lease a volunt, mes nemy pur arms, 2 E. 4. 4. payment de rent que est justment due per Iny, est bon 33 E. 3. verdict 44. sil avoit fealty de Tenant est bone 12 E. 2. Juris utrum 12. mes son act oy que turn al prejudice de son Master est male, 41 E. 3. 36. come si distress soiet prise, & le Snor avow, & le Baylie fait Conusans, &c. est voyd, Com. 282. paiment de rent issuing hors del Mannor est bone, mes Bayly ne poet enter pur condicon infreint sans express command, Dyer 222. pi. 21. La est title fait nt Ballivus, que differt de cest case; & fuit parcel de son plea, que il fait ceo come Bayly. Secondment fuit un barr al Avowry, que ne fuit barre, pur ceo que il ne respond al tout le Avowry, &c. mes icy eeant pur benefit del Siior, come prima facie il appeirt, il poet fairer Conusans ut Ballivus. Car tanque le contrary appeirt, serroit prise al benefit del Lessor. En divers cases de Eleccon le Bayly poet fair general Conisans. Si apres Statute de quia Emptores, Tenant fait Feoffraent, ore est in election sur quel le Sfior ferroit avowry, tanque notice; si le Bayly in eest case fait Conisans sur le Feoffee, come very tenant de sou Master, est bone, come fuit adjudge, veil Liver de Entries, fol. 514. & 576. Home fait Conusans come...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
McKendrick v Sinclair
...(see Adams v. Adams (Attorney-General intervening) [1971] P. 188 at page 212). 43 But the maxim cessante ratione, cessat ipsa lex(Co. Litt. 70b; Broom's Legal Maxims, 10th ed. 1939, pp. 97 ff.) is also part of English law: for a recent example of its application, albeit not expressly, see G......
-
Tonkin v Croker
...2d ed. vol. 2, p. 518. (c) Ace. Com. Dig. Copyhold, K. 25, 26, 2d ed. p. 520. (a)2 Vide Co. Cop. 51. (J)2 Sed vide Lutw. 1216. (a)3 Ace. Co. Lit. 70 b. (Z )3 Ace. C. Lit. 70 b. English Reports Citation: 92 E.R. 74 COURTS OF KING'S BENCH AND COMMON PLEAS Tonkin and ers. Croker [860] tonkin ......
-
F. H. Rennell, Administratrix of Thomas Rennell, Clerk, against The Bishop of Lincoln, T. H. Mirehouse, and W. S. Mirehouse
...to me, accounts satisfactorily for the peculiarity of the case of bishops, puts them upon the same footing as other tenants in capite (Co. Litt. 70 b.), and makes the peculiarity of their case inapplicable to the present. The only remaining argument against the plaintiff below (I believe) i......
-
R. v. Paradis, (1977) 13 N.R. 251 (SCC)
...Ritchie, J., in Davies, supra, at p. 310 C.C.C., p. 719 D.L.R.), does not exist, and the maxim cessante ratione legis, cessat ipsa lex (Co. Litt. 70b) applies. "With great respect, we are unable to agree with this submission or with the conclusion of the Court in R. v. Gratton, supra, ......