Beddow v Beddow
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1877 |
| Year | 1877 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
45 cases
- Attorney-General (Commonwealth) v Schmidt [No2]
- Dunlop Rubber Company v Dunlop
-
Rasu Maritima S.A. v Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara (Government of the Republic of Indonesia intervening)
...whenever it appears to the court to be just or convenient. The statute was so interpreted by Sir George Jessel, Master of the Rolls, in Beddow v. Beddow (1878) 9 Chancery Division page 93. In 1883 this court in the North London Railway case (1883) 11 Chancery Division made statements limiti......
-
Faith Panton Property Plan Ltd v Hodgetts
...or convenient so to do." Mr Brodie submits that the discretion given to the court is one which is unfettered and relies on the cases of Beddow v. Beddow 9 Ch. D 89Blunt v. Blunt (1943) A.C. 517 and Ward V. James (1966) 1 Q.B. 273. In the latter case Lord Denning, at page 295, said "The case......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
THE USE AND ABUSE OF ANTI-ARBITRATION INJUNCTIONS
...Steamship Den of Airlie Co Ltd v Mitsui and Co Ltd(1912) 17 Com Cas 116. 20Malmesbury Railway Co v Budd(1876) 2 Ch D 113; Beddow v Beddow(1878) 9 Ch D 89. 21Huyton SA v Peter Cremer GmbH & Co[1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep 620 at 623 and 642. 22Compagnie Européenne de Céréales SA v Tradax Export SA[19......