Begum v Entry Clearance Officer (Dhaka)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year2001
Date2001
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • NH (India) v Entry Clearance Officer, Mumbai
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 13 d4 Dezembro d4 2007
    ...with the applicant. But the question has always to be answered in terms of art 8 and its jurisprudence (see Husna Begum v ECO, Dhaka [2001] INLR 115, §21, per Pill LJ), and that in my view is what was done here by the adjudicator in relation to a fact situation which displayed few of the fe......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2015-01-02, OA/10799/2013 & OA/10798/2013
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 2 d5 Janeiro d5 2015
    ...The Respondent’s reliance on family life continuing in Kenya was significant because the Court of Appeal in Husna Begum v ECO (Dhaka) [2001] INLR 115 had accepted that the ability of a sponsor to live with an applicant outside the UK was relevant for the purposes of determining the ‘far mor......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2021-03-30, HU/21259/2018 & HU/21255/2019
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 30 d2 Março d2 2021
    ...with the applicant. But the question has always to be answered in terms of art 8 and its jurisprudence (see Husna Begum v ECO, Dhaka [2001] INLR 115 , §21, per Pill LJ), and that in my view is what was done here by the adjudicator in relation to a fact situation which displayed few of the f......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2013-12-23, OA/08022/2012 & Ors.
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 23 d1 Dezembro d1 2013
    ...his biological children were entitled to entry clearance and had the intention to exercise that right. In the case of Husna Begum v ECO [2001] INLR 115 CA the issue was whether a daughter could be considered to be living alone under paragraph 317 of the Immigration Rules when at the date of......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT