Beitov Properties Ltd v Elliston Martin

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Neutral Citation[2012] UKUT 133 (LC)
Date2012
Year2012
CourtUpper Tribunal (Lands Chamber)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Ms Cynthia Prempeh v Mrs Ferakh Lakhany
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 Octubre 2020
    ...is No, as s. 47(1) of the 1987 Act requires the demand to give the landlord's own name and address: see Beitov Properties Ltd v Martin [2012] UKUT 133 (LC) where the President of the Lands Chamber of the Upper Tribunal held that a demand that contained the landlord's name but did not contai......
  • Kung Ling Yen v 林慧翔 And Others
    • Hong Kong
    • 18 Enero 2023
    ...intended appeal may be summarised as follows. 7.1 The Deputy Adjudicator erred in holding that Beitov Properties Ltd v Elliston Martin [2012] L & TR 23, which dealt with the proper construction of s.47(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (which has no equivalent in Hong Kong), does not a......
  • 長城物業有限公司 v Kung Ling Yen
    • Hong Kong
    • 18 Enero 2023
    ...intended appeal may be summarised as follows. 7.1 The Deputy Adjudicator erred in holding that Beitov Properties Ltd v Elliston Martin [2012] L & TR 23, which dealt with the proper construction of s.47(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (which has no equivalent in Hong Kong), does not a......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Landlord's Name And Address On Service Charge Demands
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 17 Julio 2012
    ...importance of getting your service charge demands right every time. In the recent decision of Beitov Properties Ltd v Elliston Martin [2012] UKUT 133 (LC), the Upper Tribunal rendered a number of service charge demands invalid on a purely technical construction of Section 47 of the Landlord......