Bell v Holmes
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Assizes |
| Year | 1956 |
| Date | 1956 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
20 cases
-
Randolph v Tuck
... ... Blackburn Borough Council [ 1939 ] 2 K.B. 426 ; 55 T.L.R. 389 ; [ 1939 ] 1 All E.R. 273 , C.A. considered ... Bell v. Holmes [ 1956 ] 1 W.L.R. 1359 ; [ 1956 ] 3 All E.R. 449 and Clyne v. Yardley [ 1959 ] N.Z.L.R. 617 not followed ... (3) ... ...
- Dayang anak Ngipa; Wee Bing Po
- Wall v Radford
-
Morrison Rose & Partners v Hillman
...he Plaintiff was unrepresented and the Court did not have a proper argument; but I cannot agree. 16 Finally, in ( Bell v. Holmes 1958 1 Weekly Law Reports, 1359) Mr Justice McNair held that a judgment in an earlier case given after a later action had been started, created an estoppel. The P......
Get Started for Free
