Bentley and Another v Gaisford and Another

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date21 October 1996
Date21 October 1996
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Datuk M Kayveas v Bar Council
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • White v Withers LLP
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • October 27, 2009
    ... ... Most of the 42 documents are financial documents of one sort or another. Mr White points out that they were addressed to him but sent to a number ... man's goods without his permission is prima facie tortious.” In Bentley v Gaisford [1997] Q.B. 627 , 635 Sir Richard Scott V-C observed in a ... ...
  • Madam Packiam Ramalingam v Badan Peguam Malaysia
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • January 1, 2000
  • Udoamaka Onuigbo (also known as OKORONKWO) v R
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • January 31, 2014
    ... ... whether one party may exercise a lien over the property of another (see paragraph below 48). A solicitor's lien is said to arise at common ... In Bentley v Gaisford [1997] QB 627 the Court of Appeal held that the release of ... ...
  • Get Started for Free