Bentsen v Taylor Sons & Company (No 2)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1893
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
97 cases
  • Compagnie Commerciale Sucres et Denrees v C Czarnikow Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 11 October 1990
    ...the sellers was a condition of the contract. Kerr L.J. quoted from the classic judgment of Bowen L.J. in Bentsen v. Taylor, Sons & Co. [1893] 2 Q.B. 274 [1893] 2 Q.B. 274, 281: "There is no way of deciding that question except by looking at the contract in the light of the surrounding circu......
  • Alval Ltd v Attorney General of Jamaica
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 28 October 2011
    ...elect to keep the contract alive. If the right to rescind is not exercised it is waived but the right to damages is still available; Bentsen v Taylor & Sons (1893) 2 QB 274. See also Roberts v Bury Commissioners (1870) L.R. 5 C.P. 310 at p 320 and 325-326 . 48 In this case the contractor ......
  • Tan Tien Seng v Grobina Resorts Sdn Bhd (No.2)
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2005
  • Stocznia Gdanska SA v Latvian Shipping Company (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 June 2002
    ...conduct gives the innocent party a right of election, to accept or to affirm the contract, and that there is no middle path: see Bentsen v. Taylor [1893] 2 QB 274 at 279, Fercometal SARL v. Mediterranean Shipping Co SA [1989] 1 AC 788 at 799/801, The Kanchenjunga [1990] 1 Lloyd's Rep 391 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Contract Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2003, December 2003
    • 1 December 2003
    ...importance of the particular term of the contract concerned (see, eg, per Bowen LJ (as he then was) in Bentsen v Taylor, Sons & Co (No 2)[1893] 2 QB 274 at 281), whilst the other is termed the ‘Hong Kong Fir approach’ (which looks, instead, to the nature and consequences of the breach conce......
  • Anticipatory Repudiation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Performance and Breach
    • 4 August 2020
    ...Johnstone v Milling, above note 33; Pamarta Holdings Ltd v Routledge (1974), 52 DLR (3d) 19 (Ont HCJ). 69 Bentsen v Taylor, Sons & Co , [1893] 2 QB 274; Hain SS Co Ltd v Tate & Lyle Ltd (1936), 41 Com Cas 350. 70 Kloepfer Wholesale , above note 7; Hasham v Zenab , [1960] AC 316 (PC). 71 See......
  • DEMYSTIFYING THE RIGHT OF ELECTION IN CONTRACT LAW
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2006, December 2006
    • 1 December 2006
    ...473 at 479 (per Lord Atkin): “full knowledge of the various rights amongst which he elects” is required. 15 Bentsen v Taylor, Sons & Co [1893] 2 QB 274, the Court of Appeal had to determine the question whether the statement “now sailed or about to sail” in the charterparty was a condition ......
  • THE DEVELOPMENT OF SINGAPORE LAW: A BICENTENNIAL RETROSPECTIVE1
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2020, December 2020
    • 1 December 2020
    ...the “condition-warranty approach” (as elaborated upon the oft-cited English Court of Appeal decision of Bentsen v Taylor, Sons & Co [1893] 2 QB 274 at 281, per Bowen LJ (as he then was)) and the “Hongkong Fir approach” (which draws its terminology from the leading English Court of Appeal de......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT