Berliner Bank A.G. v C. Czarnikow Sugar Ltd (Rama)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1996 |
| Date | 1996 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Admiralty) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
- UBS AG (as successor to Swiss Bank Corporation) v Omni Holding AG ((in Liquidation))
-
PEMILIK-PEMILIK DAN/ATAU PENCARTER-PENCARTER DEMIS TONGKANG ATAU VESEL “WANTAS 17†vs PEMILIK-PEMILIK KAPAL ATAU VESEL “MY FERRY 2â€
...can be found in the case the “Eschersheimn” [1976] 2 Lloyd's Rep 1 and Berliner Bank A.G v C. Czarnikow Sugar Ltd (“The Rama") [1996] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 281. In the case of the “Eschersheim” supra, the House of Lords "... To fall within the phrase not only must the damage be the direct result or......
-
The "Vinalines Pioneer"
...Preferring Nagrint v The Ship Regis (1939) 61 CLR 688 (“The Regis”) over Berliner Bank AG v C Czarnikow Sugar Ltd (“The Rama”) [1996] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 281 (“The Rama”), the AR opined that a ship which capsized and caused damage to property on board could be considered to be the instrument of d......
-
Samsun Logix Corporation v Oceantrade Corporation
...perceived as unhelpful by that Court. It is therefore appropriate for me to proceed. See, generally, the discussion in The “Rama” [1996] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 281, at pp. 288–291. I remind myself that the issue for my determination is confined to the question of whether, as a matter of English law......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
The maritime lien and the present Australian admiralty law
...as applied in England prior to the independence of Cyprus on 15 August 1960. See Berliner Bank AG v C Czarnikow Sugar Ltd (The Rama) [1996] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 281; PA Neocleous, “Maritime Liens and Ranking of Priorities According to Cypriot Law” [1999] The International Journal of Shipping Law 4......
-
FULFILLING THE DUTY OF FULL AND FRANK DISCLOSURE IN ARREST OF SHIPS
...Act (Cap 123, 2001 Rev Ed) s 3(1)(d); see the externality criterion for claims for damage done by ship as set out in The Rama[1996] 2 Lloyd's Rep 281 and adopted locally in The Vinalines Pioneer[2016] 1 SLR 448. 43 High Court Admiralty Jurisdiction Act (Cap 123, 2001 Rev Ed) s 3(1)(l); a co......
-
Admiralty, Shipping and Aviation Law
...to ship 2.29 The first basis on which the defendant applied to set aside the writ was founded on Clarke J's decision in The Rama[1996] 2 Lloyd's Rep 281. In that case, Clarke J held that, in order to bring a claim within the English equivalent of s 3(1)(d) of the Act, the claimant had to sh......