Bhimji and Others v Chatwani and Others ; Chatwani and Others v Bhimji and Others (No 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1992 |
| Date | 1992 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
CHS CPO GmbH (in bankruptcy) and Another v Vikas Goel and Others
...is by no means an irrelevant or fanciful consideration, for as Knox J put it in the English High Court decision of Bhimji v Chatwani [1992] BCLC 387 at Indeed, in my judgment the very size of that figure [claimed with respect to fortification by the defendants in that case] lends some weigh......
-
CHS CPO GmbH (in bankruptcy) and Another v Vikas Goel and Others
...is by no means an irrelevant or fanciful consideration, for as Knox J put it in the English High Court decision of Bhimji v Chatwani [1992] BCLC 387 at Indeed, in my judgment the very size of that figure [claimed with respect to fortification by the defendants in that case] lends some weigh......
-
Sinclair Investment Holdings SA v Cushnie and Others
...the court cannot abdicate the responsibility for deciding where the balance of convenience lies." (my emphasis) 23 In Bhimji –v—Chatwani [1992] BCLC 387 Knox J was faced with an application for fortification of a cross-undertaking. In that case, having considered a passage from DPR Futures,......
-
Brainbox Digital Ltd v Backboard Media Gmbh and Another
...significant loss on the other hand. There must be an evidential foundation for the case for fortification: see Bhimji v Chatwani (No 2) [1992] BCLC 387 per Knox J at p403, Pugachev supra per Lewison at [98]. Mr Mallin sought to suggest that in this case, such were the deficiencies in Mr Bou......
Request a trial to view additional results