Bineta, The
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1966 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
- Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd v Owners of the Ship or Vessel 'Able Lieutenant'
-
The "Kapitan Temkin"
...The [1991] 1 SLR (R) 523; [1991] SLR 694, HC (folld) Andres Bonifacio, The [1993] 3 SLR (R) 71; [1993] 3 SLR 521, CA (folld) Bineta, The [1967] 1 WLR 121; [1966] 2 Lloyd's Rep 419 (folld) Guiseppe di Vittorio, The [1998] 1 Lloyd's Rep 136 (distd) Nazym Khikmet, The [1996] 2 Lloyd's Rep 362 ......
-
The "Opal 3" ex "Kuchino"
... ... Whoever, without being registered, claims ownership must displace that prima facie evidence ... The principle of prima facie evidence stated in Chorley and Giles is supported by ` The Rose `3 and ` The Bineta `4 but they must read with reference to British law. Admiralty jurisdiction ... A claimant invoking the admiralty jurisdiction of the High Court against a ship must first establish that he has a maritime claim under s 3 of the Act and that it arose in connection with a ship. Then if the ... ...
- The Hamburg Star
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
IN PERSONAM LIABILITY, BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP AND THE ACTION IN REM
...subsequent proceedings. See also Order 70 rule 29 of the Rules of the Supreme Court. 56 [1993] 2 S.L.R. 698. 57 Ibid., at 710. 58 [1966] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 419. 59 [1992] 2 S.L.R. 585. 60 See “The Opal 3”[1992] 2 S.L.R. 585 at 589. 61 Ibid., at 590. 62 Ibid. For a recent application of these pr......